Development of More Accurate Correction Factors through Heat Balance Modeling
Development of Controllable Parameter Heat Rate Effect Curves Using PEPSEŽ
It's the Megawatts Stupid!
Heat Rate Assessments and Training Improve Bottom Line for AES
Performance Assessments: An Essential Tool for Heat Rate Improvement
An Overview of the Motivation and the Method for Heat Rate Awareness
Training
Development of More Accurate
Correction Factors through Heat Balance Modeling
M. B. Caudill, Vice President, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
R. D. Griebenow, President, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
Download
Abstract
On-line controllable loss monitoring systems require a method to calculate the heat
rate and generation impact of off-design operation. Most systems utilize the correction
curves supplied by the turbine vendor for the four primary losses (initial pressure,
initial temperature, reheat temperature, and exhaust pressure). However, these curves
are typically very generic and do not include the effects of unique turbine cycle
design characteristics. In addition, the response may vary as the unit ages and
the performance of individual cycle components begins to degrade. Therefore, using
the correction curves provided by the turbine manufacturer may not provide the desired
accuracy in many performance monitoring system applications.
This paper outlines a method to develop heat rate and generation correction curves
for the primary controllable parameters through heat balance modeling. It will include
plant specific curves developed using this method for the original design cycle
configuration and a comparison with the curves provided by the original turbine
addition, it will include the results of studies performed to determine the impact
of turbine cycle performance degradation on the plant specific correction curves.
________________________________________
Development of Controllable Parameter
Heat Rate Effect Curves Using PEPSEŽ
Ronald D. Griebenow, President, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
Download
Abstract
On-line controllable loss monitoring systems require a method to calculate the heat
rate impact of off design operation. Most systems utilize the correction curves
supplied by the turbine vendor for the four primary losses (initial pressure, initial
temperature, reheat temperature, and exhaust pressure). Using the generic curves
provided by the turbine manufacturer may not provide the desired accuracy in your
performance monitoring system results.
This paper outlines a method to develop heat rate effect curves for the primary
controllable parameters using the PEPSEŽ heat balance code. The results of this
method will be compared to the curves supplied by General Electric for one of the
270 megawatt steam turbines owned and operated by Santee Cooper.
________________________________________
It's the Megawatts Stupid!
2005 Presented at the EPRI Heat Rate Improvement Conference
Bruce Kelly, Senior Engineer, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
Ron Griebenow, President, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
Download
Abstract
Most people would probably remember a sign in the early Clinton White
house which read, "It's the Economy Stupid". That phrase successfully set the tone
for the Clinton Presidency. The phrase which should set the tone for the next generation
of performance engineering at fossil fueled power plants is, "It's the Megawatts,
Stupid". For too long performance engineers have been trying to promote energy saving
ideas to power plant owners and managers, however, these owners and managers are
not going to pay too much attention to the bottom line until the top line is satisfied.
The top line, which is the meeting of production goals, is usually the highest priority,
with fuel savings falling further down the priority list. It is important to realize
that power plants are factories and as such do have production quotas. As most performance
engineers are well aware, the top line is directly connected to the bottom line
in that the process of carefully monitoring and manipulating performance enhances
the top line by increasing availability and capacity factor.
This paper will address the issues of heat rate improvement that
directly affect the top line of fossil fueled power plants, offering a new focus
for heat rate improvement activities.
________________________________________
Heat Rate Assessments and Training
Improve Bottom Line for AES
2005 Presented at the EPRI Heat Rate Improvement Conference
Steve Williams, AES Corporation
Tony Coleman, AES Corporation
Ron Griebenow, Performance Engineer, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
Marcus Caudill,Vice President, Performance Consulting Services, Inc.
Download
Abstract
AES Corporation is a global energy provider that is motivated to
improve and optimize corporate heat rate. With more than 113 facilities worldwide,
representing over 45,000 megawatts of capacity, a heat rate improvement of one percent
would represent a large savings in fuel costs. With this in mind, AES has established
a corporate plan to support the separate AES businesses in optimizing heat rate.
Two key activities that have jumpstarted the heat rate improvement process are heat
rate assessments and heat rate awareness training.
The purpose of the heat rate assessment is to help identify the key
contributors to offdesign heat rate, and then to prioritize corrective actions based
on cost effectiveness. Heat rate assessments and training have been conducted at
a number of AES facilities over the past year, with key findings that can result
in almost immediate payback for the assessment cost. This paper presents an outline
of the assessment process, key findings from various assessments, and future plans
to continue the heat rate improvement process at AES.
________________________________________
Performance Assessments: An Essential
Tool for Heat Rate Improvement
1998 Presented at the EPRI Heat Rate Improvement Conference
Marcus Caudill, EPRI-CAC, Performance Consulting Services, Inc
Peter Ruestman, EPRI-CAC, Performance Consulting Services, Inc
Ken LaMont, Hoosier Energy
Bob Hill, Hoosier Energy
Download
Abstract
As the utility industry transitions from a regulated to a competitive
market, many companies are facing a shift in business practices to meet this new
challenge.
Many areas of plant and corporate operations are being studied, including
marketing, staffing, maintenance, operation, and management practices. The ultimate
goal of all of these studies is to reduce overall generating costs, while still
providing a reliable supply of electric power. While there are significant economic
reasons for considering all areas of plant cost containment, the area of heat rate
improvement offers the opportunity to significantly reduce plant fuel consumption,
which is usually the largest single operating cost in a plant.
While there are many tools available to help improve heat rate and
reduce fuel consumption, a performance assessment is an essential tool that provides
a comprehensive picture of current heat rate improvement activities, establishes
or verifies current and potential performance levels and defines a plan for achieving
and maintaining peak unit performance. This paper details the methodology developed
for conducting a successful performance assessment and discusses the application
of the method to a performance assessment of Hoosier Energy's Merom Generating Station.
________________________________________
An Overview of the Motivation and
the Method for Heat Rate Awareness Training
1998 Presented at the EPRI Heat Rate Improvement Conference
Marcus Caudill, EPRI-CAC, Performance Consulting Services, Inc
Peter Ruestman, EPRI-CAC, Performance Consulting Services, Inc
Download
Abstract
Staff training is not a new concept in the electric power industry.
In particular, unit operator training has been proven to offer significant savings
in operations and maintenance costs. As the utility industry continues its transition
from a regulated to a competitive market, the importance of a well-trained team
of employees becomes more evident. Most of the training in the area of heat rate
improvement has been developed for performance engineers and others with a technical
background, with little heat rate training effort focused on maintenance, electrical,
I&C, chemistry and operations personnel.
EPRI-CAC has developed two levels of heat rate awareness training,
an introductory level that requires no previous exposure to heat rate concepts,
and a secondary level that assumes some basic knowledge of power cycles. This paper
discusses the motivation for the development of these heat rate awareness classes,
an overview of the class methodology and materials, and feedback from initial class
participants.